History: This slide is
obtained from the archive and the history was not known. However,
patients with this type of pathologic changes typically complain of
heart burn and/or have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It is
more common in men than women. The specimens being shown here is
obtained by endoscopic biopsy.
Histologic Highlights of this Case:
-
The specimen is an endoscopic biopsy and
contains 4 fragments of tissue. In one of the fragments (Area 1),
there is both squamous epithelium and columnar epithelium. The
squamous epithelium indicated that this is obtained from the
esophagus or gastroesophageal (GE) junction. The presence of
columnar epithelium, however, does not necessarily mean that the
biopsy is obtained at the GE junction because metaplastic columnar
epithelium can be found in areas higher than the GE junction.
Usually, the endoscopist will specify the location where the biopsy
is taken (expressed in cm distal to the incisors).
-
There are two types of metaplastic
epithelium. The gastric type have histologic features similar to the
stomach. The other is the colonic (intestinal) type that contains
mucin containing goblet cells. This type is associated with increase
risk of malignancy. The metaplastic changes often but not always
contain both types. The identification of genuine goblet cells is
necessary for a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (specialized
columnar epithelium). Identification of goblet cells is therefore an
important task.
-
Dysplastic changes from mild to severe
can be seen in Barrett's esophagus and it is very important for the
pathologist to report these changes in the reports.
Additional Information:
References:
-
Shi XY, Bhagwandeen B, Leong AS.CDX2
and villin are useful markers of intestinal metaplasia in the
diagnosis of Barrett esophagus.
Am
J Clin Pathol. 2008 Apr;129(4):571-7.
-
van Baal JW,
Bozikas A, Pronk R, Ten Kate FJ, Milano F, Rygiel AM, Rosmolen WD,
Peppelenbosch MP, Bergman JJ, Krishnadath KK.
Cytokeratin and CDX-2 expression in
Barrett's esophagus. Scand J
Gastroenterol.
2008;43(2):132-40.
|